Categories
Archives
CCCF’s Twitter Feed
- Want to Improve Science Communication? Start with Bad PowerPoint Habits desmogblog.com/want-improve-s… 2 months ago
- How Big Business Tries To Corrupt Science | Care2 Causes care2.com/causes/how-big… 2 months ago
- CCCF Meeting Thurs 20 Oct 7pm at CEP Offices Tolvaddon Energy Park Camborne, Cornwall TR14 0HX - cornwallclimateforum.co.uk 7 months ago
- RT @OneClimate: This one is a biggie: say no tar sands in Europe http://bit.ly/kJ5s2k #climate 11 months ago
- #Cornwall #Community #Climate #Forum is now on twitter - http://www.cornwallclimateforum.co.uk 11 months ago
Tags
148 denials refuted!
http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Nuff said?
Posted in Climate Science, Debunking Denial
Tagged climate, climate sceptics, mythbusting, sceptics, science
The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism
www.skepticalscience.com/The-Scientific-Guide-to-Global-Warming-Skepticism.html
A downloadable publication.
Getting sceptical about climate sceptics.
http://www.skepticalscience.com A dish best served cold.
Posted in Climate Science, Debunking Denial
Tagged mythbusting, sceptics
From primers to expert links
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/05/start-here/
“We’ve often been asked to provide a one stop link for resources that people can use to get up to speed on the issue of climate change, and so here is a first cut. Unlike our other postings, we’ll amend this as we discover or are pointed to new resources. Different people have different needs and so we will group resources according to the level people start at.
For complete beginners:
NCAR: Weather and climate basics
Oxford University: The basics of climate prediction
Pew Center: Global Warming basics
Wikipedia: Global Warming
NASA: Global Warming update
National Academy of Science: Understanding and Responding to Climate Change
Encyclopedia of Earth: Climate Change Collection
Global Warming FAQ (Tom Rees)
Global Warming: Man or Myth? (Scott Mandia, SUNY Suffolk)
There is a new booklet on Climate Literacy from multiple agencies (NOAA, NSF, AAAS) available here (pdf).
The UK Govt. has a good site on The Science of Climate Change (added Sep 2010).
The portal for climate and climate change of the ZAMG (Zentralaanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Vienna, Austria). (In German) (added Jan 2011)
Those with some knowledge:
The IPCC AR4 Frequently Asked Questions (here (pdf)) are an excellent start. These cover:
- What Factors Determine Earth’s Climate?
- What is the Relationship between Climate Change and Weather?
- What is the Greenhouse Effect?
- How do Human Activities Contribute to Climate Change and How do They Compare with Natural Influences?
- How are Temperatures on Earth Changing?
- How is Precipitation Changing?
- Has there been a Change in Extreme Events like Heat Waves, Droughts, Floods and Hurricanes?
- Is the Amount of Snow and Ice on the Earth Decreasing?
- Is Sea Level Rising?
- What Caused the Ice Ages and Other Important Climate Changes Before the Industrial Era?
- Is the Current Climate Change Unusual Compared to Earlier Changes in Earth’s History?
- Are the Increases in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases During the Industrial Era Caused by Human Activities?
- How Reliable Are the Models Used to Make Projections of Future Climate Change?
- Can Individual Extreme Events be Explained by Greenhouse Warming?
- Can the Warming of the 20th Century be Explained by Natural Variability?
- Are Extreme Events, Like Heat Waves, Droughts or Floods, Expected to Change as the Earth’s Climate Changes?
- How Likely are Major or Abrupt Climate Changes, such as Loss of Ice Sheets or Changes in Global Ocean Circulation?
- If Emissions of Greenhouse Gases are Reduced, How Quickly do Their Concentrations in the Atmosphere Decrease?
- Do Projected Changes in Climate Vary from Region to Region?
RealClimate: Start with our index
Informed, but in need of more detail:
Science: You can’t do better than the IPCC reports themselves (AR4 2007, TAR 2001).
History: Spencer Weart’s “Discovery of Global Warming” (AIP)
Art: Robert Rohde’s “Global Warming Art‘
Informed, but seeking serious discussion of common contrarian talking points:
All of the below links have indexed debunks of most of the common points of confusion:
- Coby Beck’s How to talk to Global Warming Skeptic
- New Scientist: Climate Change: A guide for the perplexed
- RealClimate: Response to common contrarian arguments
- NERC (UK): Climate change debate summary
- UK Met Office: Climate Change Myths
- Brian Angliss A Thorough Debunking
- John Cook Skeptical Science
- The Global Warming Debate (slides)
Please feel free to suggest other suitable resources, particularly in different languages, and we’ll try to keep this list up to date.”
Settled science
http://www.eecg.utoronto.ca/~prall/climate/index.html
“This site provides information on over 2400 climate scientists and authors who have signed public statement on climate change. This includes both statements calling for action to cut greenhouse gas emissions as well as ones that argue against such action.
Each name has a link to the person’s web page at a university or national research lab, where one was found. I used Google Scholar to look up what each author had published on climate, and how widely cited their work is. This information lets us compare the credibility of those arguing against curbs on greenhouse emissions versus those supporting them.
The upshot of this comparison is that the climate change “skeptic” position has very few authors with any standing as climate scientists.
While there have been several public declarations challenging the basic science or the need for any response like emission reductions, including some with a large number of names, the great proportion of those signers turn out to have little or no qualifications on this topic.”
Posted in Climate Science, Introduction to Climate Science, Peer Reviewed Science
Tagged consensus, science
Metric tons today
Live counter showing metric tons of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Posted in Climate Science, Introduction to Climate Science
Tagged science
Who funds the deniers?
Surely not vested interests?
Posted in Climate Science, Debunking Denial, Politics of Denial
Tagged climate sceptics, vested interests
Clearing the PR pollution that clouds climate science.
“The DeSmogBlog Project began in January 2006 and quickly became the world’s number one source for accurate, fact based information regarding global warming misinformation campaigns.
Our articles and stories are routinely highlighted in the world’s most popular news blogs: New York Times DotEarth, Huffington Post, Daily Kos, ThinkProgress, and Treehugger, to name a few. DeSmogBlog has won the Canadian Public Relation Society’s Leadership in Communcation award, and was voted Canada’s “Best Group Blog” by their peers.
The successes of the DeSmogBlog have attracted the attention of the media in North America and the UK. Our work has generated stories in major traditional media outlets including The New York Times, The UK Guardian, BBC, The Globe and Mail, Associated Press and CBC. In our capacity as research experts in global warming misinformation campaigns we have assisted major media such as ABC News, Associated Press, BBC World Service and The Globe and Mail in the development of global warming story ideas and content.
The DeSmogBlog team is led by Jim Hoggan, founder of James Hoggan & Associates, one of Canada’s leading public relations firms. By training a lawyer, by inclination a ski instructor and cyclist, Jim Hoggan believes that integrity and public relations should not be at odds – that a good public reputation generally flows from a record of responsible actions. His client list includes real estate development companies, high tech firms, pharmaceutical, forest industry giants, resorts and academic institutions. He is also a Board Member of the David Suzuki Foundation.
You can go here to read Jim’s popular DeSmogBlog manifesto: Slamming the Climate Skeptic Scam.
The DeSmogBlog team is especially grateful to our founding benefactor John Lefebvre, a lawyer, internet entrepreneur and past-president of NETeller, a firm that has been providing secure online transactions since 1999. John has been outspoken, uncompromising and courageous in challenging those who would muddy the climate change debate, and he has enabled and inspired the same standard on the blog.”
Posted in Climate Science, Debunking Denial, Politics of Denial
Tagged climate, climate sceptics, mythbusting, sceptics, science
Rapid Response Resources
www.climaterapidresponse.org/resources.php
An excellent collection of resources including:
- Documents from Scientific Organizations
- Other Useful Documents
- Blogs & News
- Books
- Videos
Posted in Climate Science, Introduction to Climate Science, Peer Reviewed Science
Tagged science resources
Climate Science Rapid Response Team (CSRRT)
NAME: Climate Science Rapid Response Team (CSRRT)
WEBSITE: www.climaterapidresponse.org
WHO & WHAT: The CSSRT is a match-making service between top scientists and members of the media and office holders and their staffs from various levels of government. Our group consists of dozens of leading scientists who wish to improve communication about climate change. The group is committed to providing rapid, high-quality information to media and government officials. Our members have expertise in virtually all areas of climate science and they are available to share their current understanding in a fairly rapid time frame.
HOW IT WORKS: Inquirers will use the form on the Website to identify themselves and to send their questions along with the desired timeframe of the response. That information will immediately be sent to three people: Dr. John Abraham, Dr. Ray Weymann, and Prof. Scott Mandia. These three “match-makers” will immediately notify up to three scientists with the most appropriate expertise. One scientist or one of the three CSRRT match-makers will then respond directly to the inquirer with the correct science information.
WHY WE DO IT: There is a sharp divide between what scientists know about climate change and what the public knows. The scientists of the CSSRT understand that better communication can narrow this gap. The media is in the best position to deliver accurate science information to the general public and to our elected leaders but only if they are provided with that information. The CSRRT is committed to delivering that service We are advocates for science education
How to talk to a climate sceptic
www.scienceblogs.com/illconsidered/2008/how_to_talk_to_a_sceptic.php
is superb with a breakdown of commonly spouted dangerous rubbish and an appropriate response to each

